February 15, 2012

  • About the Recent Stabbing Incident . . .

    Current mood: cynical

    Got this in my email on Friday –


    ——– Original Message ——–
    Subject: CNM – UNM Emergency Alert
    Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:26:54 -0500 (EST)
    From: AttentionCNM Official Communication

    AttentionCNM Emergency Notice: UNM Police: CNM Main should be on alert for white female stabbing suspect 5’9″ brwn hair black jacket purple PJ pants. Call 911 if seen.

    There’s a few questions that the above message doesn’t answer. I’ll list the immediately obvious ones here.

    1. Are there any other details on the description of the suspect? Apparent weight? Hairstyle? Tattoos? Piercings? Glasses or sunglasses?

    2. Where exactly did the alleged stabbing take place? How badly injured was the alleged victim?
    3. Which way was the suspect headed?
    4. Did the suspect get into a vehicle? If so, what did it look like? License plate? Was she driving, or just a passenger?
    5. Were there other people involved the incident? (Besides the suspect described above and the victim, but you should already know that’s what I meant with this question.)
    6. Was the suspect carrying anything that might have belonged to the victim?

    So what say you, “Suncats” ?

    Does CNM need its own police force, as UNM has the UNMPD? No, I’m not referring to UNM’s Campus Security (apparently a subdivision of UNMPD) – according to the UNM site, UNMPD has sworn, accredited, and commissioned officers on staff. These people carry pistols on their belts (and probably long guns in their cruiser trunks), they have powers of arrest, and are also commissioned as deputy sheriffs with BCSO.

    I would answer this question with one word – “NO!” – CNM does NOT need its own “CNMPD.” Instead, the Administration and Governing Board should simply do away with the current policy of victim disarmament where students, staff and faculty are concerned.

    And why exactly would I refer to such “safety-oriented” policies as the no-weapons rules that CNM and UNM have as “victim disarmament”? Really, folks – it’s simple, look up the two words “victim” (see #2) and “disarmament” for yourself – the phrase is self-explanatory. The very people that these policies are intended to stop are the same people who are least likely to obey these policies.

    Look at how well these sorts of policies worked at stopping Seung-Hui Cho and Nidal Malik Hasan, then get back to me about the “necessity” for them, OK?

    So long as UNM and CNM retain their victim-disarming policies, I will assume that administrators on both campuses are tacitly OK with events such as this recent stabbing, as well as the alleged rape of 13 December 2010 and the 4 January 2011 UNMH Shooter. After all, the criminals aren’t barging into meetings of UNM’s Board of Regents or CNM’s Governing Board to wreak havoc. It’s only the rest of us that have to live with the risk.


    Copyright © 2012 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.

    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with gedit and Notepad++.

March 23, 2011

  • Survey from the Chronicle

    Current mood: amused     

    Here is the latest CNM Chronicle Reader Survey. My answers are interleaved throughout below.

    1. How often do you read the CNM Chronicle?

      Weekly
      Bi-weekly
      Monthly
      Never

    2. What would you like to read in the CNM Chronicle?

      Letters to the editor
      Op-ed pieces by students

    3. What section do you like in the CNM Chronicle?

      Front page news
      Did You Know?
      Opinion
      Restaurant reviews
      Theater reviews
      Movie reviews
      Music reviews
      Word on the Streets (WOTS)
      Relationship column
      Things to do
      From the Tack Board
      All
      Other (please specify)

    4. What campus do you pick up the CNM Chronicle?

      Main
      Montoya
      Westside
      Rio Rancho
      South Valley
      Work Force Training Center
      Other (please specify)

    5. Did you know that the CNM Chronicle has a web site?

      YES
      NO

    6. Do you follow the CNM Chronicle social media, i.e. facebook[1] and twitter[1]?

      YES
      NO


    NOTES

    1. Shouldn’t “facebook” and “twitter” be capitalized, as in “Facebook” and “Twitter” ?
    2. Reposted –
      1. Personal blog

    Copyright © 2011 CNM Dissent. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises. Webmaster Mike Blessing
    This blog entry created with Notepad++

January 5, 2011

  • What about the UNMH Shooter?

    Current mood: bitter, cynical

    ——– Original Message ——–
    Subject: UNM Incident 01/04/11
    Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:10:01 -0500 (EST)
    From: Attention CNM Official Communication

    UNM North Campus Situation: Active Shooter at UNM. There is no imminent threat at CNM properties. No further information is available at this time. Please refer to local news outlets for information on street closures.

    For those not “in the know,” the phrase “Active Shooter” means someone who carries their gun(s) into a venue where people are present and starts shooting people. These “Active Shooters” usually pick places to do this where everyone else in the vicinity has been disarmed by the venue’s rules and regulations. Other examples: Virginia Tech, Ft. Hood, in that on most college campuses and military posts, the carrying of firearms or “other weapons” is forbidden to everyone except those who have official permission. CNM[1] and UNM[2] have such policies.

    When was the last time you heard of one of these incidents happening at a shooting range, or at a gun show? You would think that places with lots of armed people present would have blood on the floor a foot deep. But no, those are some of the safest places I’ve been to in my life, and – get this! – everyone is polite to everyone else. Whodathunk it?

    ——– Original Message ——–
    Subject: Lockdown Alert – Main Campus 01/04/11
    Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:37:16 -0500 (EST)
    From: Attention CNM Official Communication

    CNM Main Campus is on lockdown temporarily due to UNMH suspect at-large. CNM Security personnel will notify occupants of change in status.

    So CNM went on “lockdown” for an incident that happened over a mile away from CNM’s facilities?! What was this clown carrying, a Barrett M82 variant?!

    Even IF he had been carrying some sort of .50-caliber rifle[3], he wouldn’t have been able to hit much of anything at CNM with it, considering that there’s all kinds of these things called buildings in the way. Also consider that even with a rifle chambered in .50 BMG, you still have to be a decent shot to hit CNM property from the UNMH location – there is, after all, about 1.5 miles between the two.

    ——– Original Message ——–
    Subject: ALL CLEAR – LOCKDOWN LIFTED
    Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:45:41 -0500 (EST)
    From: Attention CNM Official Communication

    ALL CLEAR. The CNM lockdown has been lifted. Thank you for your cooperation.

    Whew! Aren’t we lucky that such an incident didn’t happen at CNM? After all, the administrators haven’t gotten their plan together to deal with such incidents yet:

    CNM should consider adding School Shooter planning to their Emergency Management Plan (EMP), and consider a joint training exercise in the future with the Albuquerque Police Department (APD), APD Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) units, Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office (BCSO), hospitals, and other agencies and organizations as appropriate.

    The college has instituted Emergency Management Training, which when fully implemented will be mandatory training of all CNM employees. This training contains three modules, Active Shooter, Emergency Evacuation, and Disruptive Students. Additionally, the college has included a SWAT/APD Active Shooter Drill on the Two Year Safety and Security Calendar. The college is planning an Emergency Response Team Exercise conducted by APD during the Fall 2010 term, and a full drill scheduled for 2011.

    I’m wondering – what will this “Active Shooter” module to the Emergency Management Training consist of, besides the admonition to lock the door and a revival of the Cold-War era “doctrine” of “duck and cover”?

    Y’know, CNM could save a bundle on “expert” panels and seminars if they would simply strike the prohibition against armed students, faculty and staff[1] and let people go about their business armed. Think of the saved costs of electrical power in terms of electricity not used for PowerPoint shows.

    Hell, CNM could even make a few bucks off of this, by offering courses in self-defense and firearms safety and proficiency.


    NOTES

    1. From the CNM “General Safety” page:
      • Never bring firearms or other weapons on premises, including buildings, parking lots and vehicles.
      • Fascination with guns or other weapons may indicate an employee at risk for violent behavior. Carefully consider such situations and, if appropriate, report it to your supervisor.
    2. 2. Violent Behavior

      Violent behavior will not be tolerated.

      • Violent behavior includes verbal, written, physical, electronic, or non verbal threats or other behavior that would constitute a threat of violence or cause a reasonable person to be fearful.
      • Violent behavior includes physical acts against persons, University property, or property belonging to others that would constitute a threat of violence or cause a reasonable person to be fearful.
      • Violent behavior includes restraining an individual or interfering with someone’s free movement, except in patient care or child care areas when specifically authorized by departmental policy.
      • Violent behavior includes the possession or use on University property of firearms, ammunition, or weapons of any kind, unless authorized for law enforcement personnel by the University Chief of Police. This also includes brandishing any object that could reasonably be perceived as a weapon. The University’s policy on weapons is listed in Section 2.1. below. [Emphasis mine – MWB]
      • Violent behavior includes the use or possession on University property of dangerous substances or materials, explosives, or incendiary devices, unless used for University business, such as research, and specifically authorized in advance by Safety & Risk Services.

      2.1. Weapons Prohibited on University Property

      Law enforcement officers, in the performance of their authorized duties, may carry weapons on campus. ROTC students conducting required and supervised drills may carry inoperable weapons only for the purpose of those drills.

      With the foregoing exceptions, no person may use or possess a weapon on any part of campus. For the purpose of this policy, weapons include, but are not limited to, firearms, ammunition or other dangerous weapons, substances, or materials, bombs, explosives, or incendiary devices. Persons with such weapons, materials, or devices must enter campus at the closest point to the Campus Police Office and deposit all weapons or materials at that office for the duration of their stay. Dangerous substances and materials used for University business, such as research, must be authorized in advance by Safety & Risk Services.

      If any person does carry such weapons and/or materials on campus, the weapons and/or materials may be impounded by a law enforcement officer for the duration of the person’s stay on campus and the person may also be subject to appropriate disciplinary and/or criminal action.

    3. Chances are the firearms this clown carried were NOT anything chambered in .50 BMG, but something smaller and lighter, that’s easier to walk around the UNMH corridors with.

    Copyright © 2010 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.   

    This blog entry created with Notepad++

December 17, 2010

  • Crime and Self-Defense at CNM

    Current mood: cynical

    ——– Original Message ——–
    Subject: Timely Notice of Incident on Main Campus
    Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:36:24
    From: cnm@cnm.edu
    To: undisclosed-recipients

    It was reported to CNM Security today (Dec. 13) that an alleged sexual assault of a female occurred on Dec. 6, 2010, at 1 p.m. at the BMX parking lot on CNM’s Main Campus[1]. Anyone with information should contact Lt. Conklin in the CNM Security department at 224-4635. It is believed that the suspect was a male around 6-feet tall and heavy set with long black hair and thick facial hair/mustache, possibly Hispanic or Native American, driving a van.

    All individuals should remain vigilant and aware of their surroundings in parking lots and should report any suspicious or unusual activity to CNM Security immediately at 224-3001.

    This notice is sent in compliance with the “Timely Notice” provisions of the federal Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act of 1998[2].

    How nice of the Administration to comply with federal law in notifying us students and faculty about this incident.

    Still, it is rather . . . (is “alarming” too strong a word here? No, it isn’t) . . . alarming that such an incident like this could happen in broad daylight is what we would presume to be an open parking lot[3].

    I wonder if this incident might have been facilitated in any way by CNM’s policies of victim disarmament[4]:

    Never bring firearms or other weapons on premises, including buildings, parking lots and vehicles.


    NOTES

    1. The BMX parking lot is tucked away behind Isotopes Park and the Student Services Center – see this map for yourself.
    2. Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act of 1998
    3. Classes for the Fall 2010 semester concluded on Saturday, 11 December.
    4. Related post – Is CCW (Partially) OK on Campus?
    5. Reposted –
      1. New Mexico Liberty

    Copyright © 2010 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.   

    This blog entry created with Notepad++

July 20, 2009

  • Advanced Lasers and “the Suncat”

    Current mood:

    Yeah, I know I haven’t posted here in a while. Sue me.

    Today I checked CNM’s Facebook page and found out that — TA-DAAA!!! — they are getting ready to release the Suncat.

    Click the pictures for the full-sized versions
     

    Yeah, I know that’s kind of a bummer. Maybe you were expecting something really grand?

    Here’s what I posted to the update in question (besides my preference for the CNMone) —

    I like the mascot that gets me into the Advanced Laser and electronics classes that I need to graduate.

    Considering that (Acting) Applied Technologies Chair Michael Cranney –

    • FIRST refused to schedule Advanced Laser Systems without 12 people wanting to sign up for it,
    • THEN told us he’d offer it in the Spring 2010 semester,
    • NOW he’s saying he’ll offer it on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays,

    I might as well put my hopes on the Suncat.


March 22, 2009

  • Sol vs. The CNMone?

    Current mood: amused, annoyed

    Recently, CNM selected the name for the school’s proposed mascot — “Sol the SunCat.” [1]

    Here’s three proposed pictures of “Sol” – 


    Does the mascot come with a UNM-style athletics program and a bunch of coaches with the I’m-outta-here-if-I-don’t-get-the-raise-I-want attitude?

    This entry (rather sarcastic, and rightfully so, in my opinion) is hands-down the best of the bunch –


    What the CNM Mascot would look like if scientists ruled the school. :)
    The CNMone (C-N-M-o-n-ee)

    Why do I say it’s the best? It’s not for the quality of the artwork, as “The CNMone” is a hand-drawn sketch, as the others have the look of being put together by someone with some skills in the graphic arts. No, “The CNMone” is the best as it showcases the absurdity of the whole mascot gimmick.

    Apparently, I’m not alone in thinking that this whole scheme to “market” the school is idiotic. Here’s the comments that were printed in the Chronicle – 

    I think they’re pretty tight, I mean some of them look kind of corny, but that little one does look pretty tight [center Suncat]. But I wouldn’t wear that sh*t on a shirt.
    Tom Cordova

    It looks like an elementary school mascot, not one for a college
    Kelly Simpson

    It’s pathetic, I don’t even really know what it is. Are those flames, or what are they supposed to be? It looks like a pokemon.
    Ashley Gabaldon

    It [expletive] sucks. I don’t even know what the [expletive] that is. No, this is not high school, this is college, get it together.
    Shavon Davis

    I don’t like it, I just don’t think it will catch on.
    Megan Galles

    Kirsten Crocker knocks this BS ball out of the park with her op-ed piece titled “CNM to be laughing stock of collegiate community” –

    One of the perks of being a pessimist is that reality rarely presents you with scenarios that are worse than you had originally anticipated. So, naturally, I was utterly flabbergasted when I first caught sight of CNM’s official mascot prototypes. My default response of genuine amusement kicked in immediately; my laughter came to a tapered squelch, however, as I realized this was no joke.

    A mascot is, by definition, supposed to be a representative symbol of an institution, ergo a group of people. How do these prototypes represent CNM? Well, they certainly imply that we have a serious case of dignity deficiency, and make it painstakingly obvious that we don’t even take ourselves seriously. These god-awful designs also relay a warning not to take CNM’s computer animation courses.

    If I recall correctly the student voting on the mascot several months back — you know, the great hoax which had its preconcieved notions and didn’t for a moment consider the actual wishes of the student body — I believe the consensus had voted for the implementation of a roadrunner as the mascot. On what grounds was that idea poo-pooed? Given our location, a roadrunner seems a perfectly acceptable critter of choice. If you’ve ever seen one combination prowling-scurrying through your yard, you can’t deny that the roadrunner is a creature of majesty which commands respect; “I used to be a dinosaur, b****.”

    We have until March 20 to protest these abominations, ladies and gentlemen. I would encourage you, if you would prefer not to be the laughing stock of the collegiate community, to pencil in your suggestions, perhaps a word or two of protest, on the ballots as opposed to degrading yourselves and voting on one of the strkingly similar prototypes. These things should be trapped inside the virtual realm of a Giga Pet, not ironed onto college T-shirts.



  • FREE Thunderbirds Tickets!

    Current mood: amused
    Date: March 13, 2009
    Subject: Students Get in Free for Thunderbirds Games

    Take advantage of free admission to the remaining Albuquerque Thunderbirds games and check out some high flying NBA Development League basketball talent. Admission is free when you show your CNM student ID. There are seven home games left. To check out the remaining home schedule, go to nba.com/dleague/albuquerque/

    And here I was under the impression that since the Thunderbirds were having trouble bringing in crowds of over 1,000 people, and with that being the case, they wouldn’t bother asking for your ID, student or otherwise, so long as you’re willing to walk in and buy from the concession stands.



  • A Spring Break for CNM?

    Current mood: annoyed

    Apparently, the Administration is considering some sort of spring break –

    Date:    March 17, 2009
    Subject: Should CNM Have a Spring Break?

    CNM is considering whether to provide a one-week spring break for students and faculty beginning in spring 2010. If CNM adds a spring break to the academic calendar in future years, it would extend the spring term by one week. Please take a moment to give us your feedback on the possibility of creating a one-week spring break in future years by completing a quick survey.

    Survey — What do you think about a spring break?

    I am a
    • Student
    • Faculty member
    • Staff member

    Do you want the college to have a one week spring break?

    NO

    If no, why?

    • The shorter break between the end of the summer term and beginning of the fall term would negatively affect my ability to prepare for the fall term.
    • A spring break would disrupt the effectiveness of my teaching.
    • A spring break would be disruptive to my student learning experience.

February 27, 2009

  • What’s Going On with the Chronicle?

    Current mood: amused

    What exactly is going on with the CNM Chronicle?

    Notice that I linked to the paper’s page above? Here’s what you should see (click the picture for a bigger view).


    Well, folks, that page has been “under construction” since I signed on as a student in May, 2008. Just how long does it take to put up just a basic-level page?

    Then there’s the fact that they’ve apparently stopped all delivery to the North side of the Main Campus — there hasn’t been a new issue up there since 3 February, which is over three weeks ago. I ended up walking over to the Ken Chappy Building to find a current copy.

    Here’s the comment I posted to CNM’s Facebook page

    No Chronicle for the Applied Technologies people north of Coal at Main Campus? I’ve noticed that the most current edition on the racks is the 3 Feb one, and it’s over two weeks past that.

    That was posted there by me on 18 February 2009.

    Whatever will we do without our weekly dose of eco-fascism from the editors?